The NT Fracking Inquiry: Current News, Facts and Backlash
Home » The NT Fracking Inquiry: Current News, Facts and Backlash
In 2016, the Northern Territory (NT) government announced a temporary ban on hydraulic fracturing (fracking). At the time, the government explained that it would set up an inquiry into fracking in the NT. Therefore, it asked an independent scientific panel to assess the environmental effects of the gas extraction technique.
The NT fracking inquiry’s final report
In March 2018, the NT fracking inquiry publicly released its final report. The report made 135 recommendations. The scientific panel designed them to bring environmental risks down to acceptable levels. Accordingly, the territory government said that they would adopt these recommendations. Therefore, it removed the fracking ban.
Fracking in the Northern Territory
The NT fracking inquiry established “no-go” zones. Therefore, 51 per cent of the territory is now open to fracking. The Beetaloo Basin is the largest fracking development in the NT. The federal government has identified it as a priority as part of its “gas-led recovery“. Therefore, the government has announced more than AUD $200 million in investment in the basin. This means that the federal government will subsidise 25 per cent of the cost of new fracking wells for private companies. These include Santos, Origin Energy and Imperial Resources.
The government’s implementation plan
In July 2018, the NT government released a plan to implement the fracking inquiry’s recommendations. As of August 2021, the government had implemented 46 per cent of them. On the other hand, it had not finished 53 per cent of the recommendations. Plus, the government had yet to start one per cent of them. This has led environmental organisations to criticise the government. The NT government is failing to minimise the risks of fracking, according to the Arid Lands Environment Centre.
Government fails to implement NT fracking inquiry recommendations
The Arid Lands Environment Centre lists several NT fracking inquiry recommendations that the government has failed to implement. For example, the gas industry is supposed to pay for scientific baseline assessments. However, these costs currently fall to NT taxpayers. Plus, the government has set 18-month timeframes for these assessments. They were supposed to last three to five years. On top of this, not one environment impact assessment has been conducted for current fracking projects. Again, this does not meet the NT recommendations of the fracking inquiry.
“NT Fracking Inquiry in Ngukurr, Roper River” by Lock the Gate Alliance (CC BY 2.0)
In June 2021, the Senate voted in federal parliament for an inquiry into the fracking of the Beetaloo Basin. This came after pressure from First Nations anti-fracking campaigners. In particular, these Traditional Owners sent an open letter to the parliament. Furthermore, 35,000 people from across Australia signed it. Specifically, this letter cited potential risks to land and water.
Environmental implications of hydraulic fracturing
Fracking can cause environmental contamination, including to groundwater. Therefore, communities cited water-related risks in their submissions to the NT fracking inquiry. Furthermore, fracking in the NT will put threatened animal species at risk. That is because gas wells ruin their habitat. That is the case of the Gouldian Finch, for example.
Finally, fracking in the NT will cause high amounts of greenhouse gas emissions. For example, the Beetaloo Basin could account for seven to 22 per cent of Australia’s total emissions. It is not likely that the NT government could offset that many emissions. Again, this would mean a failure to respect the NT fracking inquiry recommendations.